Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Hush Crime Rally - 2007

(Rally date to be announced by VNN on 4/1/07)


START TODAY! GET THE WORD OUT! “HUSH CRIME RALLY” --- > Knoxville, Tennessee . . . in the planning stages ---- > NOW!!!


This rally began to come to light after the brutal and savage carjacking, kidnapping, rape, sodomy and murder of a young White couple accosted by black savages while on a date. The national jewish owned networks have refused to report on this vicious and sadistic black attack. The victims; “Christopher Newsom” and "Channon Christian” will be honored and remembered in a rally scheduled for late spring/early summer. Please plan to attend.

For more information, see the links below. Also note: VNN, is organizing the rally. Keep up to date by browsing that site. VNN has a forum that you may want to join to voice your opinion. Again, the links are below.


HUSH CRIMES Rally - 2007!






Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom





Special thanks to the Aryan Barbarian of "Expose Them All" blog for all of the above info!


SPECIAL NOTICE: A rally of White people of EVERY background is being planned to take place in Knoxville, TN in late spring/early summer 2007. The theme is "Hush Crimes" - the media refuses to report on crimes against OUR race with the same ferocity as crimes against other races - even though crimes committed against us, is much more prevalent. . . . NOTE: See poster/flyer at bottom of page [see link to the Expose Them All blog site above to see the flyer.]

Saturday, March 24, 2007

The Rapture Myth

This article was published on Planet Preterist Columns
The URL for this story is: http://planetpreterist.com/news-2008.html

The Rapture Myth by Charles Roberts

No part of Scripture can be interpreted in such a way as to render it in conflict with what is clearly taught elsewhere in Scripture.

Comparing this text in 1 Thessalonians to the text in Matthew 24 will help you to better understand its meaning.

Matthew 24:30-31 (KJV) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

Jesus spoke these words in the context of the destruction of Jerusalem and said that their generation would see all these things fulfilled (Matthew 24:34).

In biblical language, "clouds" are symbolic of God's wrath and judgment against the enemies of His people.

David said that the Lord delivered him from his enemies while descending on clouds in Psalm 18:3-15.

The Lord said that He would ride into Egypt on a cloud and punish them:
Turn with me to:
Isaiah 19:1 (KJV) The burden of Egypt. Behold, the LORD rideth upon a swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt: and the idols of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, and the heart of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it.

The Lord did not literally ride on a cloud, but Egypt did receive this judgment at the hands of the Assyrians (Isaiah 20:1-6). The idea of Jesus physically coming on the clouds would have been contrary to the nature of their understanding of the Old Testament prophets.

In Matthew 24, Jesus predicted his coming to gather together the saints in that generation. 1 Thessalonians 4-5 is dealing with exactly the same coming, judgment, and gathering that Matt. 24 is.

1 Thessalonians 4:16 (NKJV) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.

Paul is talking to the Thessalonians about Christ's coming in judgment in that generation. As you look back you see that this judgment coming was accomplished in the destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem in AD 70.

Now if you are a good student of the Bible, you might well be asking yourself, well, why doesn’t the Bible teach this?

Let me answer that question in two ways:

First of all, the BIBLE DOES teach it. That’s what Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13, and the entire book of Revelation are all about! But secondly, you will not find ANY reference in the whole of the NT to the destruction of the Temple as a something had come and gone, as a past event.

Instead you only find predictions of it. Now what does that tell you? It tells you that the whole of the NT from Matt 1 to Rev 22 was written BEFORE the Temple’s destruction in AD 66-70.

1 Thessalonians 4:17 (NKJV) Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.

This is the verse that the physical rapture theory comes from.

Let's start with the first word in the verses -the word "then." This is the Greek word epeita, and the best translation becomes "after then", "after that", or "after that time", and thereby doesn't include the idea of right after.

Let's look at some other uses of epeita to get a clearer idea of its meaning:

Galatians 1:18 (NKJV) Then (epeita) after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and remained with him fifteen days.

In this case, the word "then" involved at least three years later.

Galatians 2:1 (NKJV) Then (epeita) after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me.

Now look at 1 Corinthians 15:5-8:
1 Corinthians 15:5-8 (NKJV) and that He was seen by Cephas, then (eita) by the twelve. 6 After that (epeita) He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that (epeita) He was seen by James, then (eita) by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time.

The point is, that the form of the word for "then" used in 1 Thessalonians 4:17 is not the form eita, meaning: "right after", but the epeita, meaning: "after that time."

1 Thessalonians 4:17 (NKJV) Then (after that time) we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.

The words "caught up" are the Greek word harpazo, it means: "to snatch away." This is where the word "rapture" comes from. When the NT was translated from Greek into Latin, the Latin word used here is "rapiemur" from which we get the English word, Rapture.

But being "caught up" means something different than a levitation of the physical body from earth up into the atmosphere of the sky. Harpazo could refer to the body being "caught up" but it could also refer to the Christian being "caught up" without the body.

If I am coming to visit you and I have to take the Interstate to get to where you are, I may well get physically “caught up” in traffic. But that doesn’t mean I go in an upward direction. By the same token, I may get so engrossed in reading a novel or watching a movie that I get so “caught up” in it that I lose all track of time. My being “caught up” in reading a novel describes a state of mind, not a physical movement.

Now I don’t believe that the Bible teaches, and I think we all know that Paul didn't mean, that living Christians would be caught up in their living, physical bodies at the judgment coming of Christ because that never happened. Christians were still around on the earth after the Fall of Jerusalem, as history plainly tells us.

1 Thessalonians 4:17 (NKJV) Then (later on, after that) we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.

Paul says that those who were alive at the judgment coming will later be caught up together with the dead who were raised, to meet the Lord in the air. You might ask, "What does the Bible mean when it says that we shall be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air?" Does this mean we'll be physically sucked up into the sky? What does the word "air" mean? Is it in our atmosphere or the air we breath? I think that Ephesians chapter 2 gives us an idea of what air means here.

Eph 2:2: "And you were dead in your trespasses and sins, in which you formerly walked
according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the AIR, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience."

The word "air" is an another word for heavenly or spiritual realm. Satan was always an opponent of the scheme of redemption, as we can see throughout the Bible. He was (past tense) the prince of the power of the air.

In Rom. 16:20, Paul says that Satan would be crushed "shortly" under their feet (remember original relevance).

Jesus now has taken over that sphere and rules in the "air" with the saints. If that is the same "air" where the saints were to meet, then there is no necessity for us to believe that the rapture has reference to a physical realm.

Paul believed that the Lord would return in his lifetime. He preached strongly about the coming judgment upon that generation, and about a resurrection, but he never spoke of a physical "rapture" for living Christians. What is popular misunderstood to be The "rapture" deals with a passage to the heavenly realm. All believers are all snatched away when they die. This gathering began with the consummation of the kingdom, after the resurrection of the dead saints out of Hades, and continues throughout this age.

Now, the church confesses that there will be an end point to this. History is moving toward a final consummation and culmination of this process wherein a new heavens and new earth will finally come into being.

1 Thessalonians 4:18 (NKJV) Therefore comfort one another with these words.

Our hope is not to be snatched physically off the face of the earth prior to our death. What did our Lord Jesus himself pray concerning his Apostles?

NKJ John 17:15 "I do not pray that You should take them out of the world, but that You should keep them from the evil one.

NJB John 17:15 I am not asking you to remove them from the world, but to protect them from the Evil One.

Our hope is that when we do die physically, we will be "raptured" into the heavenly realm to forever dwell in the presence of the Lord. "Therefore comfort one another with these words."

(the author gratefully acknowledges his reliance upon the works of Gary DeMar and John Bray for some of the examples and illustrations in this article)

Note: Opinions presented on PlanetPreterist.com or by PlanetPreterist.com columnists may not necessarily reflect the position of PlanetPreterist.com, or reflect the beliefs, doctrine or theological position of all other preterists. We encourage all readers to first and foremost carefully analyze all articles in the light of God's Word.

Copyright planetpreterist.com. PRETERISM and PRETERISM.COM are registered trademarks of Planet Preterist. Read the complete article at:
http://planetpreterist.com/news-2008.html

Sunday, March 11, 2007

It's ALL Crackpot Theology When It Comes To Modern Israel

Crackpot Theology Makes Bad Foreign Policy by Doug Bandow

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

Washington needs to develop a Mideast policy that advances the interests of America, not one that advances a peculiar interpretation of Christian theology.

Georgia's Republican state chairman, Ralph Reed, recently wrote: "There is an undeniable and powerful spiritual connection between Israel and the Christian faith. It is where Jesus was born and where he conducted his ministry."

So? This has nothing to do with the formulation of foreign policy... [for modern day America. Sure most Americans may consider themselves atleast nominally Christian and thus feel some nostalgia for the places mentioned in the New Testament but that was 2000 years ago! The modern Israeli state is no way shape or form, not even spiritually or Theologically the same place it was in ancient times nor the first century. -comment in brackets added by Paul Kersey]

Onetime Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer goes further: "The Bible is pretty clear that the land is what is called covenant land, that God made a covenant with the Jews that that would be their land forever."

Yet the premise of Christianity is that that covenant was voided by disobedience, and thus now runs to the body of Christian believers. [Exactly! Moreover, the covenant was made with Israelites which consisted of 12 tribes not just the one tribe of Judah which Jews claim to be the descendants of. Jesus called them imposters and liars and of their father the devil not Abraham. By the time of Christ Judea had already absorbed so much Edomite blood [the blood of Essau who lost the birth right to Jacob/Israel that most Judeans were no longer genuine Israelites. Old Testament Law clearly states that a mamzer or mongrel can not inherit the promise, birthright of Israel nor even enter heaven or the Kingdom of God! ~ Paul Kersey]

Moreover, why assume that nonreligious Jews who established a secular state in the Mideast are entitled to the same land once held by religious Jews following in the line of Moses? As Marvin Olasky, editor of World Magazine, notes, "A biblical case can certainly be made that Israelis who are atheists have tossed away their inheritance just as Esau did."

And if the land was to belong to Jews forever, why did they lose control of it? Surely God does not require America's assistance to give it back.

[It wasn't about land it was about a racial nation. That is why Israelites were commanded to drive out , or "ethnically cleanse" to use the modern PC phraseology, the new nation. The word "holy" is a poor english translation of the original Greek word which should have been translated separate or separated. God's command is not to be pious or "holier than thou" but to be a separate people, nation, race.

The Jews are trying to separate themselves in their attempt to gain the dominion promised to pure descendants of Adam but God will allow no rest for the wicked. They will never have peace and will never be able to create anything other than Babylon style mongrel empires.

God says they will keep building and He will keep tearing down what they build as He did with the Tower of Babel. When they try to unite different cultures and races under their rule while they themselves attempt to remain a separate people [the untouchable elite who is above the law] God will send them strong delusions to confuse them and throw them into a cycle of bitterly divisive and self-destructive in-fighting and anarchy.]

Finally, to how much are Jews entitled? A generous reading of Genesis suggests ownership of Jordan and chunks of Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Syria.

Another group of Christians, primarily Protestants, cite their dispensationalist eschatology, or end times theology. Never mind the complicated details of this minority interpretation. Backing whoever happens to be Israel's Prime Minister is supposed to accelerate Christ's return.

Of course, there is no way to prove what God actually intends. But the dispensationalist case is particularly strained. For instance, candidates for the Antichrist include the Pope, European Union President Roman Prodi and England's Prince Charles.

[no people has ever fit the definition of anti-Christs better than the modern Talmudic and atheist Zionist Jewish people themselves! They are the true anti-spiritual and material inheritors of Cain, Essau, and the Pharisees whom Jesus called a den of vipers - i.e. compare to what God said in Genesis would be at enmity [war] with the seed of Adamkind, the seed of the serpent!]

In fact, the book of Revelation is best understood in the context of the Roman Empire, when it was written. It foreshadows an apocalyptic end of mankind; it does not provide an exact time line of events.

[No it does not literally nor figuratively have anything at all to do with "an apocalyptic end of mankind." The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ predicted the end of the Old Testament Hebraist/Yahweyist religion centered around the Temple of Jerusalem and the sacrificial covenant and all it's associated culture, rituals, and way of life. The world as the Israelites had known it for so many centuries was coming to a close and a new and everlasting covenant was beginning which kept what was pure and discarded what was corrupt and barren.]

This argument also arrogantly assumes that the God who reconciled mankind through the sacrifice of his son requires Washington's help to get the end right. Interestingly, some Orthodox Jews are hostile to Zionism precisely because they view it as hubris for man to try to supplant God's timing. [Note that these anti-Zionist Jews are still very much Zionists in the theological sense. They only differ in that they believe God will miraculously save the Jews - those who are not atheist anyway - and give them all the power and glory the modern militant atheist Zionists have been trying to gain by force. So really they are no different as far as Christ is concerned. They merely differ in their methods to the same end. To Christ there are only two kinds of people in the world. Those who are with Him and those against Him.]

Another argument is that only by supporting Israel will America prosper. For example, activist Ed McAteer cites the promise that "I will bless them who bless you and curse them who curse you." Two decades ago, the Rev. Jerry Falwell declared that God had been kind to America only because "America has been kind to the Jews."

[What God is referring to here is not modern Talmudic Jewry but rather His chosen race descended from Adam. But Adam fell and many of his descendants corrupted their seedline and did not preserve the original racial identity and associated genetically determined inheritance [upon which spiritual things in this world must be based - just as faith without works is dead so is there no spirit without a body and light cannot have anything to do with darkness and noone can serve two masters or have the mixed inheritance of two opposing physical or spiritual natures. They can try to but God did not create a world conducive or friendly to such unnatural and unprovidential experiments they will never be sustainable "alternative lifestyles"]

Curiously, there's no verse explaining that to bless the Jewish people or to be kind to them means doing whatever the secular government of a largely nonreligious people wants several thousand years later. This is junk theology at its worst. Or almost worst. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said in a speech last March: "One of the reasons I believe the spiritual door was opened for an attack against the United States of America is that the policy of our government has been to ask the Israelis, and demand it with pressure, not to retaliate in a significant way against the terrorist strikes that have been launched against them."

Wow. God is punishing the American people because their government, which has long supported Israel more firmly than any other, is insufficiently pro-Israel.

Speaking for the creator of the universe is a dicey proposition and I won't try. But presuming that a biblical injunction to "bless" the Jewish people requires a secular state run by nominal Christians to offer a blank check to a secular state run by ethnic Jews is simply bizarre.

There are lots of sensible policy arguments for supporting Israel. But conflicting interests must still be balanced. Crackpot theology is no substitute for intelligent analysis.

[Name one sensible argument for supporting Israel. Professing to be wise you become a fool. No argument for the support of Israel can make any sense, when it the modern Jewish Identity is subjected to the scrutiny of intelligent analysis - we see that it's all crackpot theology.

Saturday, March 3, 2007

Five Minute Poll on Exiling Blacks

Your participation in this poll is crucial.

BLACK EXODUS SURVEY